Rosendo Pena Gonzalez vs Miguel Angel Viteri Fernandez
2007 · Result ½–½ · Vienna Game: Vienna Gambit (C29).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Rosendo Pena Gonzalez vs Miguel Angel Viteri Fernandez with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Rosendo Pena Gonzalez (1857)
- Black
- Miguel Angel Viteri Fernandez (1622)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2007
- Opening
- Vienna Game: Vienna Gambit (C29)
About this chess game
This chess game between Rosendo Pena Gonzalez (1857) and Miguel Angel Viteri Fernandez (1622) was played in 2007 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Vienna Game: Vienna Gambit (C29). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Rosendo Pena Gonzalez games or Miguel Angel Viteri Fernandez games? This Rosendo Pena Gonzalez vs Miguel Angel Viteri Fernandez encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Vienna Game: Vienna Gambit.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Rosendo Pena Gonzalez vs Miguel Angel Viteri Fernandez?
Rosendo Pena Gonzalez vs Miguel Angel Viteri Fernandez (2007) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Rosendo Pena Gonzalez vs Miguel Angel Viteri Fernandez?
The game opened with the Vienna Game: Vienna Gambit (ECO C29).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Rosendo Pena Gonzalez vs Miguel Angel Viteri Fernandez, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.