Armando Antonio Pena Galvan vs Freddy Alberto Toro Rojas
2017 · Result ½–½ · Queen's Indian Defense (E12).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Armando Antonio Pena Galvan vs Freddy Alberto Toro Rojas with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Armando Antonio Pena Galvan (1764)
- Black
- Freddy Alberto Toro Rojas (1912)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- Queen's Indian Defense (E12)
About this chess game
This chess game between Armando Antonio Pena Galvan (1764) and Freddy Alberto Toro Rojas (1912) was played in 2017 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Queen's Indian Defense (E12). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Armando Antonio Pena Galvan games or Freddy Alberto Toro Rojas games? This Armando Antonio Pena Galvan vs Freddy Alberto Toro Rojas encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Indian Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Armando Antonio Pena Galvan vs Freddy Alberto Toro Rojas?
Armando Antonio Pena Galvan vs Freddy Alberto Toro Rojas (2017) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Armando Antonio Pena Galvan vs Freddy Alberto Toro Rojas?
The game opened with the Queen's Indian Defense (ECO E12).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Armando Antonio Pena Galvan vs Freddy Alberto Toro Rojas, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.