George Pelekis vs Adam Nowak
10. LSS Anni P-00019, 2016 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Classical Variation (B64).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay George Pelekis vs Adam Nowak with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- George Pelekis (2003)
- Black
- Adam Nowak (1539)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- 10. LSS Anni P-00019
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Classical Variation (B64)
About this chess game
This chess game between George Pelekis (2003) and Adam Nowak (1539) was played at 10. LSS Anni P-00019 in 2016 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Classical Variation (B64). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more George Pelekis games or Adam Nowak games? This George Pelekis vs Adam Nowak encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Classical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won George Pelekis vs Adam Nowak?
George Pelekis vs Adam Nowak (2016) finished 0–1, a win for Adam Nowak.
What opening was played in George Pelekis vs Adam Nowak?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Classical Variation (ECO B64).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of George Pelekis vs Adam Nowak, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.