Joao Paulo Peixoto vs Filipe Jose Fradinho Saraiva
2016 · Result ½–½ · French Defense: Exchange Variation (C01).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Joao Paulo Peixoto vs Filipe Jose Fradinho Saraiva with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Joao Paulo Peixoto (1260)
- Black
- Filipe Jose Fradinho Saraiva (1871)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- French Defense: Exchange Variation (C01)
About this chess game
This chess game between Joao Paulo Peixoto (1260) and Filipe Jose Fradinho Saraiva (1871) was played in 2016 and finished ½–½. The opening was the French Defense: Exchange Variation (C01). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Joao Paulo Peixoto games or Filipe Jose Fradinho Saraiva games? This Joao Paulo Peixoto vs Filipe Jose Fradinho Saraiva encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the French Defense: Exchange Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Joao Paulo Peixoto vs Filipe Jose Fradinho Saraiva?
Joao Paulo Peixoto vs Filipe Jose Fradinho Saraiva (2016) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Joao Paulo Peixoto vs Filipe Jose Fradinho Saraiva?
The game opened with the French Defense: Exchange Variation (ECO C01).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Joao Paulo Peixoto vs Filipe Jose Fradinho Saraiva, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.