Rudson Marinho Peixoto vs Alex Torres Carvalho
2019 · Result 1–0 · King's Indian Attack: Sicilian Variation (A08).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Rudson Marinho Peixoto vs Alex Torres Carvalho with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Rudson Marinho Peixoto (1916)
- Black
- Alex Torres Carvalho (1591)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2019
- Opening
- King's Indian Attack: Sicilian Variation (A08)
About this chess game
This chess game between Rudson Marinho Peixoto (1916) and Alex Torres Carvalho (1591) was played in 2019 and finished 1–0. The opening was the King's Indian Attack: Sicilian Variation (A08). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Rudson Marinho Peixoto games or Alex Torres Carvalho games? This Rudson Marinho Peixoto vs Alex Torres Carvalho encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Attack: Sicilian Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Rudson Marinho Peixoto vs Alex Torres Carvalho?
Rudson Marinho Peixoto vs Alex Torres Carvalho (2019) finished 1–0, a win for Rudson Marinho Peixoto.
What opening was played in Rudson Marinho Peixoto vs Alex Torres Carvalho?
The game opened with the King's Indian Attack: Sicilian Variation (ECO A08).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Rudson Marinho Peixoto vs Alex Torres Carvalho, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.