Georg Aleksander Pedoson vs Aleksandrs Jazdanovs
2015 · Result ½–½ · English Opening: Symmetrical Variation (A30).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Georg Aleksander Pedoson vs Aleksandrs Jazdanovs with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Georg Aleksander Pedoson (1748)
- Black
- Aleksandrs Jazdanovs (1889)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- English Opening: Symmetrical Variation (A30)
About this chess game
This chess game between Georg Aleksander Pedoson (1748) and Aleksandrs Jazdanovs (1889) was played in 2015 and finished ½–½. The opening was the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation (A30). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Georg Aleksander Pedoson games or Aleksandrs Jazdanovs games? This Georg Aleksander Pedoson vs Aleksandrs Jazdanovs encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Georg Aleksander Pedoson vs Aleksandrs Jazdanovs?
Georg Aleksander Pedoson vs Aleksandrs Jazdanovs (2015) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Georg Aleksander Pedoson vs Aleksandrs Jazdanovs?
The game opened with the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation (ECO A30).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Georg Aleksander Pedoson vs Aleksandrs Jazdanovs, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.