Jerome Peck vs Verna M. Fausey
USA/S00019 (USA), 2010 · Result 1–0 · King's Gambit Declined: Falkbeer Countergambit, Alapin Variation (C32).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jerome Peck vs Verna M. Fausey with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jerome Peck
- Black
- Verna M. Fausey (1741)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- USA/S00019 (USA)
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- King's Gambit Declined: Falkbeer Countergambit, Alapin Variation (C32)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jerome Peck and Verna M. Fausey (1741) was played at USA/S00019 (USA) in 2010 and finished 1–0. The opening was the King's Gambit Declined: Falkbeer Countergambit, Alapin Variation (C32). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jerome Peck games or Verna M. Fausey games? This Jerome Peck vs Verna M. Fausey encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Gambit Declined: Falkbeer Countergambit, Alapin Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jerome Peck vs Verna M. Fausey?
Jerome Peck vs Verna M. Fausey (2010) finished 1–0, a win for Jerome Peck.
What opening was played in Jerome Peck vs Verna M. Fausey?
The game opened with the King's Gambit Declined: Falkbeer Countergambit, Alapin Variation (ECO C32).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jerome Peck vs Verna M. Fausey, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.