Stanislav Pechacek vs Michal Zeinert
2006 · Result ½–½ · English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Four Knights Variation (A35).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Stanislav Pechacek vs Michal Zeinert with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Stanislav Pechacek (2142)
- Black
- Michal Zeinert (2146)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2006
- Opening
- English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Four Knights Variation (A35)
About this chess game
This chess game between Stanislav Pechacek (2142) and Michal Zeinert (2146) was played in 2006 and finished ½–½. The opening was the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Four Knights Variation (A35). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Stanislav Pechacek games or Michal Zeinert games? This Stanislav Pechacek vs Michal Zeinert encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Four Knights Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Stanislav Pechacek vs Michal Zeinert?
Stanislav Pechacek vs Michal Zeinert (2006) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Stanislav Pechacek vs Michal Zeinert?
The game opened with the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Four Knights Variation (ECO A35).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Stanislav Pechacek vs Michal Zeinert, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.