Gramajo Pazos vs Juan Iliesco
Buenos Aires ch-ARG, date unknown · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Classical Variation, Zollner Gambit (B73).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Gramajo Pazos vs Juan Iliesco with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Gramajo Pazos
- Black
- Juan Iliesco
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Buenos Aires ch-ARG
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Classical Variation, Zollner Gambit (B73)
About this chess game
This chess game between Gramajo Pazos and Juan Iliesco was played at Buenos Aires ch-ARG and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Classical Variation, Zollner Gambit (B73). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Gramajo Pazos games or Juan Iliesco games? This Gramajo Pazos vs Juan Iliesco encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Classical Variation, Zollner Gambit.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Gramajo Pazos vs Juan Iliesco?
Gramajo Pazos vs Juan Iliesco finished 0–1, a win for Juan Iliesco.
What opening was played in Gramajo Pazos vs Juan Iliesco?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Classical Variation, Zollner Gambit (ECO B73).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Gramajo Pazos vs Juan Iliesco, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.