Wojciech Zbigniew Pawlak vs Henrik Holmsgaard
2015 · Result 0–1 · English Opening: Caro-Kann Defensive System (A11).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Wojciech Zbigniew Pawlak vs Henrik Holmsgaard with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Wojciech Zbigniew Pawlak (1736)
- Black
- Henrik Holmsgaard (2275)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- English Opening: Caro-Kann Defensive System (A11)
About this chess game
This chess game between Wojciech Zbigniew Pawlak (1736) and Henrik Holmsgaard (2275) was played in 2015 and finished 0–1. The opening was the English Opening: Caro-Kann Defensive System (A11). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Wojciech Zbigniew Pawlak games or Henrik Holmsgaard games? This Wojciech Zbigniew Pawlak vs Henrik Holmsgaard encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Caro-Kann Defensive System.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Wojciech Zbigniew Pawlak vs Henrik Holmsgaard?
Wojciech Zbigniew Pawlak vs Henrik Holmsgaard (2015) finished 0–1, a win for Henrik Holmsgaard.
What opening was played in Wojciech Zbigniew Pawlak vs Henrik Holmsgaard?
The game opened with the English Opening: Caro-Kann Defensive System (ECO A11).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Wojciech Zbigniew Pawlak vs Henrik Holmsgaard, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.