Lucas Pavanelli Delgado vs Neto Joao Neumann
Brazil Open, date unknown · Result 1–0 · Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D02).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Lucas Pavanelli Delgado vs Neto Joao Neumann with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Lucas Pavanelli Delgado (1930)
- Black
- Neto Joao Neumann (1830)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Brazil Open
- Opening
- Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D02)
About this chess game
This chess game between Lucas Pavanelli Delgado (1930) and Neto Joao Neumann (1830) was played at Brazil Open and finished 1–0. The opening was the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D02). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Lucas Pavanelli Delgado games or Neto Joao Neumann games? This Lucas Pavanelli Delgado vs Neto Joao Neumann encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Lucas Pavanelli Delgado vs Neto Joao Neumann?
Lucas Pavanelli Delgado vs Neto Joao Neumann finished 1–0, a win for Lucas Pavanelli Delgado.
What opening was played in Lucas Pavanelli Delgado vs Neto Joao Neumann?
The game opened with the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (ECO D02).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Lucas Pavanelli Delgado vs Neto Joao Neumann, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.