Wolfgang Pauscher vs Rudolf, Dr. Grakovich
2008 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Knight Variation (B43).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Wolfgang Pauscher vs Rudolf, Dr. Grakovich with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Wolfgang Pauscher (1845)
- Black
- Rudolf, Dr. Grakovich (1507)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2008
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Knight Variation (B43)
About this chess game
This chess game between Wolfgang Pauscher (1845) and Rudolf, Dr. Grakovich (1507) was played in 2008 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Knight Variation (B43). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Wolfgang Pauscher games or Rudolf, Dr. Grakovich games? This Wolfgang Pauscher vs Rudolf, Dr. Grakovich encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Knight Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Wolfgang Pauscher vs Rudolf, Dr. Grakovich?
Wolfgang Pauscher vs Rudolf, Dr. Grakovich (2008) finished 1–0, a win for Wolfgang Pauscher.
What opening was played in Wolfgang Pauscher vs Rudolf, Dr. Grakovich?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Knight Variation (ECO B43).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Wolfgang Pauscher vs Rudolf, Dr. Grakovich, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.