Juergen Paulat vs Karl Ulrich, Dr. Goecke
OWL Ch, date unknown · Result ½–½ · Dutch Defense: Stonewall Variation, Modern Variation (A90).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Juergen Paulat vs Karl Ulrich, Dr. Goecke with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Juergen Paulat
- Black
- Karl Ulrich, Dr. Goecke (2205)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- OWL Ch
- Opening
- Dutch Defense: Stonewall Variation, Modern Variation (A90)
About this chess game
This chess game between Juergen Paulat and Karl Ulrich, Dr. Goecke (2205) was played at OWL Ch and finished ½–½. The opening was the Dutch Defense: Stonewall Variation, Modern Variation (A90). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Juergen Paulat games or Karl Ulrich, Dr. Goecke games? This Juergen Paulat vs Karl Ulrich, Dr. Goecke encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Dutch Defense: Stonewall Variation, Modern Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Juergen Paulat vs Karl Ulrich, Dr. Goecke?
Juergen Paulat vs Karl Ulrich, Dr. Goecke finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Juergen Paulat vs Karl Ulrich, Dr. Goecke?
The game opened with the Dutch Defense: Stonewall Variation, Modern Variation (ECO A90).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Juergen Paulat vs Karl Ulrich, Dr. Goecke, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.