Nathanael Paul vs Marek Mazek
40. Blackpool Conference, 2016 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation, English Attack (B48).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Nathanael Paul vs Marek Mazek with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Nathanael Paul (1926)
- Black
- Marek Mazek (2113)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- 40. Blackpool Conference
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation, English Attack (B48)
About this chess game
This chess game between Nathanael Paul (1926) and Marek Mazek (2113) was played at 40. Blackpool Conference in 2016 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation, English Attack (B48). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Nathanael Paul games or Marek Mazek games? This Nathanael Paul vs Marek Mazek encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation, English Attack.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Nathanael Paul vs Marek Mazek?
Nathanael Paul vs Marek Mazek (2016) finished 0–1, a win for Marek Mazek.
What opening was played in Nathanael Paul vs Marek Mazek?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation, English Attack (ECO B48).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Nathanael Paul vs Marek Mazek, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.