Catalin-Lucian Patrascu vs Imre Balog
9. Arad Open 2016, 2016 · Result 0–1 · French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Guimard Defense, Main Line (C04).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Catalin-Lucian Patrascu vs Imre Balog with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Catalin-Lucian Patrascu (2286)
- Black
- Imre Balog (1969)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- 9. Arad Open 2016
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Guimard Defense, Main Line (C04)
About this chess game
This chess game between Catalin-Lucian Patrascu (2286) and Imre Balog (1969) was played at 9. Arad Open 2016 in 2016 and finished 0–1. The opening was the French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Guimard Defense, Main Line (C04). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Catalin-Lucian Patrascu games or Imre Balog games? This Catalin-Lucian Patrascu vs Imre Balog encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Guimard Defense, Main Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Catalin-Lucian Patrascu vs Imre Balog?
Catalin-Lucian Patrascu vs Imre Balog (2016) finished 0–1, a win for Imre Balog.
What opening was played in Catalin-Lucian Patrascu vs Imre Balog?
The game opened with the French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Guimard Defense, Main Line (ECO C04).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Catalin-Lucian Patrascu vs Imre Balog, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.