Andrew I Paterson vs Alex Bullen
4NCL Division 2a, 2017 · Result 1–0 · Caro-Kann Defense: Two Knights Attack, Mindeno Variation (B11).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Andrew I Paterson vs Alex Bullen with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Andrew I Paterson (2024)
- Black
- Alex Bullen (2098)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 4NCL Division 2a
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- Caro-Kann Defense: Two Knights Attack, Mindeno Variation (B11)
About this chess game
This chess game between Andrew I Paterson (2024) and Alex Bullen (2098) was played at 4NCL Division 2a in 2017 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Caro-Kann Defense: Two Knights Attack, Mindeno Variation (B11). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Andrew I Paterson games or Alex Bullen games? This Andrew I Paterson vs Alex Bullen encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Caro-Kann Defense: Two Knights Attack, Mindeno Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Andrew I Paterson vs Alex Bullen?
Andrew I Paterson vs Alex Bullen (2017) finished 1–0, a win for Andrew I Paterson.
What opening was played in Andrew I Paterson vs Alex Bullen?
The game opened with the Caro-Kann Defense: Two Knights Attack, Mindeno Variation (ECO B11).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Andrew I Paterson vs Alex Bullen, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.