Gyozo Pataki vs Laszlo Meszaros T.
XXIX Open A, 2010 · Result 1–0 · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Noa Variation (E36).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Gyozo Pataki vs Laszlo Meszaros T. with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Gyozo Pataki (2310)
- Black
- Laszlo Meszaros T. (1504)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- XXIX Open A
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Noa Variation (E36)
About this chess game
This chess game between Gyozo Pataki (2310) and Laszlo Meszaros T. (1504) was played at XXIX Open A in 2010 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Noa Variation (E36). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Gyozo Pataki games or Laszlo Meszaros T. games? This Gyozo Pataki vs Laszlo Meszaros T. encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Noa Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Gyozo Pataki vs Laszlo Meszaros T.?
Gyozo Pataki vs Laszlo Meszaros T. (2010) finished 1–0, a win for Gyozo Pataki.
What opening was played in Gyozo Pataki vs Laszlo Meszaros T.?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Noa Variation (ECO E36).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Gyozo Pataki vs Laszlo Meszaros T., or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.