Janos Pasztorcsik vs Istvan Bardos
2016 · Result ½–½ · Queen's Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Traditional Variation (E18).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Janos Pasztorcsik vs Istvan Bardos with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Janos Pasztorcsik (2021)
- Black
- Istvan Bardos (1637)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Queen's Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Traditional Variation (E18)
About this chess game
This chess game between Janos Pasztorcsik (2021) and Istvan Bardos (1637) was played in 2016 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Queen's Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Traditional Variation (E18). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Janos Pasztorcsik games or Istvan Bardos games? This Janos Pasztorcsik vs Istvan Bardos encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Traditional Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Janos Pasztorcsik vs Istvan Bardos?
Janos Pasztorcsik vs Istvan Bardos (2016) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Janos Pasztorcsik vs Istvan Bardos?
The game opened with the Queen's Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Traditional Variation (ECO E18).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Janos Pasztorcsik vs Istvan Bardos, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.