Roberto Pastres vs Roberto Dilic
Caorle Open Caorle ITA, date unknown · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation (B47).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Roberto Pastres vs Roberto Dilic with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Roberto Pastres (2225)
- Black
- Roberto Dilic (2238)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Caorle Open Caorle ITA
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation (B47)
About this chess game
This chess game between Roberto Pastres (2225) and Roberto Dilic (2238) was played at Caorle Open Caorle ITA and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation (B47). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Roberto Pastres games or Roberto Dilic games? This Roberto Pastres vs Roberto Dilic encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Roberto Pastres vs Roberto Dilic?
Roberto Pastres vs Roberto Dilic finished 1–0, a win for Roberto Pastres.
What opening was played in Roberto Pastres vs Roberto Dilic?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation (ECO B47).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Roberto Pastres vs Roberto Dilic, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.