Rafael Moreira Passos vs Antonio Villar Marques de Sa
2018 · Result ½–½ · Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation, Reshevsky Variation (D36).
Analyze this game
Open Rafael Moreira Passos vs Antonio Villar Marques de Sa on the CipherChess board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Open the Analysis BoardMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Rafael Moreira Passos (1648)
- Black
- Antonio Villar Marques de Sa (1932)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2018
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation, Reshevsky Variation (D36)
About this chess game
This chess game between Rafael Moreira Passos (1648) and Antonio Villar Marques de Sa (1932) was played in 2018 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation, Reshevsky Variation (D36). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Rafael Moreira Passos games or Antonio Villar Marques de Sa games? This Rafael Moreira Passos vs Antonio Villar Marques de Sa encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation, Reshevsky Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Rafael Moreira Passos vs Antonio Villar Marques de Sa?
Rafael Moreira Passos vs Antonio Villar Marques de Sa (2018) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Rafael Moreira Passos vs Antonio Villar Marques de Sa?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation, Reshevsky Variation (ECO D36).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Rafael Moreira Passos vs Antonio Villar Marques de Sa, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.