Roela Pasku vs Diana Omurbekova
40. Olympiad women, 2012 · Result 1–0 · King's Indian Defense: Petrosian Variation, Normal Defense (E93).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Roela Pasku vs Diana Omurbekova with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Roela Pasku (1909)
- Black
- Diana Omurbekova (1723)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 40. Olympiad women
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Petrosian Variation, Normal Defense (E93)
About this chess game
This chess game between Roela Pasku (1909) and Diana Omurbekova (1723) was played at 40. Olympiad women in 2012 and finished 1–0. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Petrosian Variation, Normal Defense (E93). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Roela Pasku games or Diana Omurbekova games? This Roela Pasku vs Diana Omurbekova encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Petrosian Variation, Normal Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Roela Pasku vs Diana Omurbekova?
Roela Pasku vs Diana Omurbekova (2012) finished 1–0, a win for Roela Pasku.
What opening was played in Roela Pasku vs Diana Omurbekova?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Petrosian Variation, Normal Defense (ECO E93).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Roela Pasku vs Diana Omurbekova, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.