Carles Pascual Gonzalez-Novelles vs Carles Farre Buil
2018 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Closed (B25).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Carles Pascual Gonzalez-Novelles vs Carles Farre Buil with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Carles Pascual Gonzalez-Novelles (1717)
- Black
- Carles Farre Buil (1855)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2018
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Closed (B25)
About this chess game
This chess game between Carles Pascual Gonzalez-Novelles (1717) and Carles Farre Buil (1855) was played in 2018 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Closed (B25). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Carles Pascual Gonzalez-Novelles games or Carles Farre Buil games? This Carles Pascual Gonzalez-Novelles vs Carles Farre Buil encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Closed.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Carles Pascual Gonzalez-Novelles vs Carles Farre Buil?
Carles Pascual Gonzalez-Novelles vs Carles Farre Buil (2018) finished 1–0, a win for Carles Pascual Gonzalez-Novelles.
What opening was played in Carles Pascual Gonzalez-Novelles vs Carles Farre Buil?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Closed (ECO B25).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Carles Pascual Gonzalez-Novelles vs Carles Farre Buil, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.