Alexandar Miroslavovich Parushev vs Virgilio Gagliardi
VWC9 /pr 21, 2016 · Result ½–½ · Petrov's Defense (C42).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Alexandar Miroslavovich Parushev vs Virgilio Gagliardi with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Alexandar Miroslavovich Parushev (2290)
- Black
- Virgilio Gagliardi (2176)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- VWC9 /pr 21
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Petrov's Defense (C42)
About this chess game
This chess game between Alexandar Miroslavovich Parushev (2290) and Virgilio Gagliardi (2176) was played at VWC9 /pr 21 in 2016 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Petrov's Defense (C42). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Alexandar Miroslavovich Parushev games or Virgilio Gagliardi games? This Alexandar Miroslavovich Parushev vs Virgilio Gagliardi encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Petrov's Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Alexandar Miroslavovich Parushev vs Virgilio Gagliardi?
Alexandar Miroslavovich Parushev vs Virgilio Gagliardi (2016) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Alexandar Miroslavovich Parushev vs Virgilio Gagliardi?
The game opened with the Petrov's Defense (ECO C42).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Alexandar Miroslavovich Parushev vs Virgilio Gagliardi, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.