Daniel Edward Parmet vs Tomás Santamaría Pérez
NATT/7, 2016 · Result ½–½ · Semi-Slav Defense: Chigorin Defense (D46).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Daniel Edward Parmet vs Tomás Santamaría Pérez with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Daniel Edward Parmet (1890)
- Black
- Tomás Santamaría Pérez (2343)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- NATT/7
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Semi-Slav Defense: Chigorin Defense (D46)
About this chess game
This chess game between Daniel Edward Parmet (1890) and Tomás Santamaría Pérez (2343) was played at NATT/7 in 2016 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Semi-Slav Defense: Chigorin Defense (D46). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Daniel Edward Parmet games or Tomás Santamaría Pérez games? This Daniel Edward Parmet vs Tomás Santamaría Pérez encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Semi-Slav Defense: Chigorin Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Daniel Edward Parmet vs Tomás Santamaría Pérez?
Daniel Edward Parmet vs Tomás Santamaría Pérez (2016) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Daniel Edward Parmet vs Tomás Santamaría Pérez?
The game opened with the Semi-Slav Defense: Chigorin Defense (ECO D46).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Daniel Edward Parmet vs Tomás Santamaría Pérez, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.