Daniel Edward Parmet vs Hana Pechova
FICGS__CHESS__UNRATED_TOURNAMENT__000005, 2010 · Result 1–0 · French Defense: Advance Variation (C02).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Daniel Edward Parmet vs Hana Pechova with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Daniel Edward Parmet (1919)
- Black
- Hana Pechova (1563)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- FICGS__CHESS__UNRATED_TOURNAMENT__000005
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- French Defense: Advance Variation (C02)
About this chess game
This chess game between Daniel Edward Parmet (1919) and Hana Pechova (1563) was played at FICGS__CHESS__UNRATED_TOURNAMENT__000005 in 2010 and finished 1–0. The opening was the French Defense: Advance Variation (C02). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Daniel Edward Parmet games or Hana Pechova games? This Daniel Edward Parmet vs Hana Pechova encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the French Defense: Advance Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Daniel Edward Parmet vs Hana Pechova?
Daniel Edward Parmet vs Hana Pechova (2010) finished 1–0, a win for Daniel Edward Parmet.
What opening was played in Daniel Edward Parmet vs Hana Pechova?
The game opened with the French Defense: Advance Variation (ECO C02).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Daniel Edward Parmet vs Hana Pechova, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.