Mircea-Emilian Parligras vs Maksim Vasilev
35. Georgi Tringov Open, 2013 · Result ½–½ · Slav Defense: Quiet Variation, Schallopp Defense (D12).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Mircea-Emilian Parligras vs Maksim Vasilev with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Mircea-Emilian Parligras (2633)
- Black
- Maksim Vasilev (2473)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- 35. Georgi Tringov Open
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- Slav Defense: Quiet Variation, Schallopp Defense (D12)
About this chess game
This chess game between Mircea-Emilian Parligras (2633) and Maksim Vasilev (2473) was played at 35. Georgi Tringov Open in 2013 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Slav Defense: Quiet Variation, Schallopp Defense (D12). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Mircea-Emilian Parligras games or Maksim Vasilev games? This Mircea-Emilian Parligras vs Maksim Vasilev encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Slav Defense: Quiet Variation, Schallopp Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Mircea-Emilian Parligras vs Maksim Vasilev?
Mircea-Emilian Parligras vs Maksim Vasilev (2013) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Mircea-Emilian Parligras vs Maksim Vasilev?
The game opened with the Slav Defense: Quiet Variation, Schallopp Defense (ECO D12).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Mircea-Emilian Parligras vs Maksim Vasilev, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.