David Pardo Simon vs Irene Nicolas Zapata
2010 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack (B76).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay David Pardo Simon vs Irene Nicolas Zapata with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- David Pardo Simon (2354)
- Black
- Irene Nicolas Zapata (1962)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack (B76)
About this chess game
This chess game between David Pardo Simon (2354) and Irene Nicolas Zapata (1962) was played in 2010 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack (B76). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more David Pardo Simon games or Irene Nicolas Zapata games? This David Pardo Simon vs Irene Nicolas Zapata encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack.
Frequently asked questions
Who won David Pardo Simon vs Irene Nicolas Zapata?
David Pardo Simon vs Irene Nicolas Zapata (2010) finished 1–0, a win for David Pardo Simon.
What opening was played in David Pardo Simon vs Irene Nicolas Zapata?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack (ECO B76).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of David Pardo Simon vs Irene Nicolas Zapata, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.