Jose Ramon Pardo Gomez vs Jeronimo Martinez Lopez
7. Open, 2008 · Result 1–0 · Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation (C48).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jose Ramon Pardo Gomez vs Jeronimo Martinez Lopez with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jose Ramon Pardo Gomez (1686)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 7. Open
- Year
- 2008
- Opening
- Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation (C48)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jose Ramon Pardo Gomez (1686) and Jeronimo Martinez Lopez was played at 7. Open in 2008 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation (C48). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jose Ramon Pardo Gomez games or Jeronimo Martinez Lopez games? This Jose Ramon Pardo Gomez vs Jeronimo Martinez Lopez encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jose Ramon Pardo Gomez vs Jeronimo Martinez Lopez?
Jose Ramon Pardo Gomez vs Jeronimo Martinez Lopez (2008) finished 1–0, a win for Jose Ramon Pardo Gomez.
What opening was played in Jose Ramon Pardo Gomez vs Jeronimo Martinez Lopez?
The game opened with the Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation (ECO C48).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jose Ramon Pardo Gomez vs Jeronimo Martinez Lopez, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.