Manfred Pape vs Eckart, Dr. Boehm
2008 · Result 0–1 · English Opening: King's English Variation, Reversed Closed Sicilian (A25).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Manfred Pape vs Eckart, Dr. Boehm with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Manfred Pape (2286)
- Black
- Eckart, Dr. Boehm (2150)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2008
- Opening
- English Opening: King's English Variation, Reversed Closed Sicilian (A25)
About this chess game
This chess game between Manfred Pape (2286) and Eckart, Dr. Boehm (2150) was played in 2008 and finished 0–1. The opening was the English Opening: King's English Variation, Reversed Closed Sicilian (A25). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Manfred Pape games or Eckart, Dr. Boehm games? This Manfred Pape vs Eckart, Dr. Boehm encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: King's English Variation, Reversed Closed Sicilian.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Manfred Pape vs Eckart, Dr. Boehm?
Manfred Pape vs Eckart, Dr. Boehm (2008) finished 0–1, a win for Eckart, Dr. Boehm.
What opening was played in Manfred Pape vs Eckart, Dr. Boehm?
The game opened with the English Opening: King's English Variation, Reversed Closed Sicilian (ECO A25).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Manfred Pape vs Eckart, Dr. Boehm, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.