Paris Papaioannou vs Panagiotis Marios Nikolakis
2016 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Modern Variations (B50).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Paris Papaioannou vs Panagiotis Marios Nikolakis with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Paris Papaioannou (1076)
- Black
- Panagiotis Marios Nikolakis (1935)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Modern Variations (B50)
About this chess game
This chess game between Paris Papaioannou (1076) and Panagiotis Marios Nikolakis (1935) was played in 2016 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Modern Variations (B50). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Paris Papaioannou games or Panagiotis Marios Nikolakis games? This Paris Papaioannou vs Panagiotis Marios Nikolakis encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Modern Variations.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Paris Papaioannou vs Panagiotis Marios Nikolakis?
Paris Papaioannou vs Panagiotis Marios Nikolakis (2016) finished 0–1, a win for Panagiotis Marios Nikolakis.
What opening was played in Paris Papaioannou vs Panagiotis Marios Nikolakis?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Modern Variations (ECO B50).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Paris Papaioannou vs Panagiotis Marios Nikolakis, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.