Claudio Pantaleoni vs Adolf Timofeevich Rott
WT/M/GT/271, 1990 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: McDonnell Attack (B21).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Claudio Pantaleoni vs Adolf Timofeevich Rott with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Claudio Pantaleoni (2255)
- Black
- Adolf Timofeevich Rott (2395)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- WT/M/GT/271
- Year
- 1990
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: McDonnell Attack (B21)
About this chess game
This chess game between Claudio Pantaleoni (2255) and Adolf Timofeevich Rott (2395) was played at WT/M/GT/271 in 1990 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: McDonnell Attack (B21). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Claudio Pantaleoni games or Adolf Timofeevich Rott games? This Claudio Pantaleoni vs Adolf Timofeevich Rott encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: McDonnell Attack.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Claudio Pantaleoni vs Adolf Timofeevich Rott?
Claudio Pantaleoni vs Adolf Timofeevich Rott (1990) finished 0–1, a win for Adolf Timofeevich Rott.
What opening was played in Claudio Pantaleoni vs Adolf Timofeevich Rott?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: McDonnell Attack (ECO B21).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Claudio Pantaleoni vs Adolf Timofeevich Rott, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.