Willem-Jan Pannekoek vs Juha Ovaskainen
EU/TC12/sf3, 2021 · Result ½–½ · Catalan Opening: Closed, Zagoryansky Variation (E08).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Willem-Jan Pannekoek vs Juha Ovaskainen with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Willem-Jan Pannekoek (2079)
- Black
- Juha Ovaskainen (1897)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- EU/TC12/sf3
- Year
- 2021
- Opening
- Catalan Opening: Closed, Zagoryansky Variation (E08)
About this chess game
This chess game between Willem-Jan Pannekoek (2079) and Juha Ovaskainen (1897) was played at EU/TC12/sf3 in 2021 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Catalan Opening: Closed, Zagoryansky Variation (E08). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Willem-Jan Pannekoek games or Juha Ovaskainen games? This Willem-Jan Pannekoek vs Juha Ovaskainen encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Catalan Opening: Closed, Zagoryansky Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Willem-Jan Pannekoek vs Juha Ovaskainen?
Willem-Jan Pannekoek vs Juha Ovaskainen (2021) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Willem-Jan Pannekoek vs Juha Ovaskainen?
The game opened with the Catalan Opening: Closed, Zagoryansky Variation (ECO E08).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Willem-Jan Pannekoek vs Juha Ovaskainen, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.