Aleksandar Panjkovic vs Fabio Bruno
39. Arco Open 2017, 2017 · Result 0–1 · English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Ultra-Symmetrical Variation (A36).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Aleksandar Panjkovic vs Fabio Bruno with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Aleksandar Panjkovic (2130)
- Black
- Fabio Bruno (2449)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- 39. Arco Open 2017
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Ultra-Symmetrical Variation (A36)
About this chess game
This chess game between Aleksandar Panjkovic (2130) and Fabio Bruno (2449) was played at 39. Arco Open 2017 in 2017 and finished 0–1. The opening was the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Ultra-Symmetrical Variation (A36). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Aleksandar Panjkovic games or Fabio Bruno games? This Aleksandar Panjkovic vs Fabio Bruno encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Ultra-Symmetrical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Aleksandar Panjkovic vs Fabio Bruno?
Aleksandar Panjkovic vs Fabio Bruno (2017) finished 0–1, a win for Fabio Bruno.
What opening was played in Aleksandar Panjkovic vs Fabio Bruno?
The game opened with the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Ultra-Symmetrical Variation (ECO A36).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Aleksandar Panjkovic vs Fabio Bruno, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.