Jozef Paluch vs Milan Huba
2008 · Result 1–0 · English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line (A29).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jozef Paluch vs Milan Huba with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jozef Paluch (1979)
- Black
- Milan Huba (1882)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2008
- Opening
- English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line (A29)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jozef Paluch (1979) and Milan Huba (1882) was played in 2008 and finished 1–0. The opening was the English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line (A29). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jozef Paluch games or Milan Huba games? This Jozef Paluch vs Milan Huba encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jozef Paluch vs Milan Huba?
Jozef Paluch vs Milan Huba (2008) finished 1–0, a win for Jozef Paluch.
What opening was played in Jozef Paluch vs Milan Huba?
The game opened with the English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line (ECO A29).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jozef Paluch vs Milan Huba, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.