Paulo Ricardo Palozi vs Simao Poscidonio Dias
Joao Braga Open, 2011 · Result 1–0 · Slav Defense: Alapin Variation (D16).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Paulo Ricardo Palozi vs Simao Poscidonio Dias with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Paulo Ricardo Palozi (2277)
- Black
- Simao Poscidonio Dias (2032)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Joao Braga Open
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- Slav Defense: Alapin Variation (D16)
About this chess game
This chess game between Paulo Ricardo Palozi (2277) and Simao Poscidonio Dias (2032) was played at Joao Braga Open in 2011 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Slav Defense: Alapin Variation (D16). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Paulo Ricardo Palozi games or Simao Poscidonio Dias games? This Paulo Ricardo Palozi vs Simao Poscidonio Dias encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Slav Defense: Alapin Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Paulo Ricardo Palozi vs Simao Poscidonio Dias?
Paulo Ricardo Palozi vs Simao Poscidonio Dias (2011) finished 1–0, a win for Paulo Ricardo Palozi.
What opening was played in Paulo Ricardo Palozi vs Simao Poscidonio Dias?
The game opened with the Slav Defense: Alapin Variation (ECO D16).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Paulo Ricardo Palozi vs Simao Poscidonio Dias, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.