Paulo Ricardo Palozi vs Marcos Antonio Ferreira Bueno
2013 · Result 1–0 · King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation (E91).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Paulo Ricardo Palozi vs Marcos Antonio Ferreira Bueno with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Paulo Ricardo Palozi (2194)
- Black
- Marcos Antonio Ferreira Bueno (1751)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation (E91)
About this chess game
This chess game between Paulo Ricardo Palozi (2194) and Marcos Antonio Ferreira Bueno (1751) was played in 2013 and finished 1–0. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation (E91). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Paulo Ricardo Palozi games or Marcos Antonio Ferreira Bueno games? This Paulo Ricardo Palozi vs Marcos Antonio Ferreira Bueno encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Paulo Ricardo Palozi vs Marcos Antonio Ferreira Bueno?
Paulo Ricardo Palozi vs Marcos Antonio Ferreira Bueno (2013) finished 1–0, a win for Paulo Ricardo Palozi.
What opening was played in Paulo Ricardo Palozi vs Marcos Antonio Ferreira Bueno?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation (ECO E91).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Paulo Ricardo Palozi vs Marcos Antonio Ferreira Bueno, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.