Piroska Palotai vs Csaba Keresszegi
2013 · Result ½–½ · English Opening: King's English Variation, Two Knights Variation (A22).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Piroska Palotai vs Csaba Keresszegi with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Piroska Palotai (2103)
- Black
- Csaba Keresszegi (1957)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- English Opening: King's English Variation, Two Knights Variation (A22)
About this chess game
This chess game between Piroska Palotai (2103) and Csaba Keresszegi (1957) was played in 2013 and finished ½–½. The opening was the English Opening: King's English Variation, Two Knights Variation (A22). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Piroska Palotai games or Csaba Keresszegi games? This Piroska Palotai vs Csaba Keresszegi encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: King's English Variation, Two Knights Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Piroska Palotai vs Csaba Keresszegi?
Piroska Palotai vs Csaba Keresszegi (2013) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Piroska Palotai vs Csaba Keresszegi?
The game opened with the English Opening: King's English Variation, Two Knights Variation (ECO A22).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Piroska Palotai vs Csaba Keresszegi, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.