Xavier Palomo Teruel vs Luis Iglesias Fernandez
2016 · Result ½–½ · King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack (E76).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Xavier Palomo Teruel vs Luis Iglesias Fernandez with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Xavier Palomo Teruel (2055)
- Black
- Luis Iglesias Fernandez (1839)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack (E76)
About this chess game
This chess game between Xavier Palomo Teruel (2055) and Luis Iglesias Fernandez (1839) was played in 2016 and finished ½–½. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack (E76). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Xavier Palomo Teruel games or Luis Iglesias Fernandez games? This Xavier Palomo Teruel vs Luis Iglesias Fernandez encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Xavier Palomo Teruel vs Luis Iglesias Fernandez?
Xavier Palomo Teruel vs Luis Iglesias Fernandez (2016) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Xavier Palomo Teruel vs Luis Iglesias Fernandez?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack (ECO E76).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Xavier Palomo Teruel vs Luis Iglesias Fernandez, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.