Santiago Palomar Ramon vs Alejandro Anson Casaos
2014 · Result 1–0 · Caro-Kann Defense: Finnish Variation (B16).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Santiago Palomar Ramon vs Alejandro Anson Casaos with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Santiago Palomar Ramon (1994)
- Black
- Alejandro Anson Casaos (1902)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2014
- Opening
- Caro-Kann Defense: Finnish Variation (B16)
About this chess game
This chess game between Santiago Palomar Ramon (1994) and Alejandro Anson Casaos (1902) was played in 2014 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Caro-Kann Defense: Finnish Variation (B16). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Santiago Palomar Ramon games or Alejandro Anson Casaos games? This Santiago Palomar Ramon vs Alejandro Anson Casaos encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Caro-Kann Defense: Finnish Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Santiago Palomar Ramon vs Alejandro Anson Casaos?
Santiago Palomar Ramon vs Alejandro Anson Casaos (2014) finished 1–0, a win for Santiago Palomar Ramon.
What opening was played in Santiago Palomar Ramon vs Alejandro Anson Casaos?
The game opened with the Caro-Kann Defense: Finnish Variation (ECO B16).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Santiago Palomar Ramon vs Alejandro Anson Casaos, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.