Giovanni Palmieri vs Giulio Grigioni
XXXII Memorial Edoardo Crespi B, 2011 · Result 1–0 · King's Knight Opening: Normal Variation (C44).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Giovanni Palmieri vs Giulio Grigioni with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Giovanni Palmieri (1802)
- Black
- Giulio Grigioni (1896)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- XXXII Memorial Edoardo Crespi B
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- King's Knight Opening: Normal Variation (C44)
About this chess game
This chess game between Giovanni Palmieri (1802) and Giulio Grigioni (1896) was played at XXXII Memorial Edoardo Crespi B in 2011 and finished 1–0. The opening was the King's Knight Opening: Normal Variation (C44). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Giovanni Palmieri games or Giulio Grigioni games? This Giovanni Palmieri vs Giulio Grigioni encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Knight Opening: Normal Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Giovanni Palmieri vs Giulio Grigioni?
Giovanni Palmieri vs Giulio Grigioni (2011) finished 1–0, a win for Giovanni Palmieri.
What opening was played in Giovanni Palmieri vs Giulio Grigioni?
The game opened with the King's Knight Opening: Normal Variation (ECO C44).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Giovanni Palmieri vs Giulio Grigioni, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.