Jacob Pallesen vs Morten Spoer
Obro 60 aar, 1996 · Result 0–1 · Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation, Reshevsky Variation (D36).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jacob Pallesen vs Morten Spoer with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jacob Pallesen (2088)
- Black
- Morten Spoer (2000)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Obro 60 aar
- Year
- 1996
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation, Reshevsky Variation (D36)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jacob Pallesen (2088) and Morten Spoer (2000) was played at Obro 60 aar in 1996 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation, Reshevsky Variation (D36). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jacob Pallesen games or Morten Spoer games? This Jacob Pallesen vs Morten Spoer encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation, Reshevsky Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jacob Pallesen vs Morten Spoer?
Jacob Pallesen vs Morten Spoer (1996) finished 0–1, a win for Morten Spoer.
What opening was played in Jacob Pallesen vs Morten Spoer?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation, Reshevsky Variation (ECO D36).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jacob Pallesen vs Morten Spoer, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.