Mario Palladino vs Kenneth Watkins
WS/CCM/A/22, 2021 · Result ½–½ · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Noa Variation (E36).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Mario Palladino vs Kenneth Watkins with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Mario Palladino (1475)
- Black
- Kenneth Watkins (2286)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- WS/CCM/A/22
- Year
- 2021
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Noa Variation (E36)
About this chess game
This chess game between Mario Palladino (1475) and Kenneth Watkins (2286) was played at WS/CCM/A/22 in 2021 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Noa Variation (E36). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Mario Palladino games or Kenneth Watkins games? This Mario Palladino vs Kenneth Watkins encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Noa Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Mario Palladino vs Kenneth Watkins?
Mario Palladino vs Kenneth Watkins (2021) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Mario Palladino vs Kenneth Watkins?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Noa Variation (ECO E36).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Mario Palladino vs Kenneth Watkins, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.