Jarmo Palenius vs Jarkko Lehtinen
Corr JSM/M, 1981 · Result 1–0 · King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Standard Development (E73).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jarmo Palenius vs Jarkko Lehtinen with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jarmo Palenius (1852)
- Black
- Jarkko Lehtinen
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Corr JSM/M
- Year
- 1981
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Standard Development (E73)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jarmo Palenius (1852) and Jarkko Lehtinen was played at Corr JSM/M in 1981 and finished 1–0. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Standard Development (E73). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jarmo Palenius games or Jarkko Lehtinen games? This Jarmo Palenius vs Jarkko Lehtinen encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Standard Development.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jarmo Palenius vs Jarkko Lehtinen?
Jarmo Palenius vs Jarkko Lehtinen (1981) finished 1–0, a win for Jarmo Palenius.
What opening was played in Jarmo Palenius vs Jarkko Lehtinen?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Standard Development (ECO E73).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jarmo Palenius vs Jarkko Lehtinen, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.