Istvan Pajzer vs Robert Kalmar
22. Battle of Senta Open, 2018 · Result 1–0 · King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Normal Defense (E81).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Istvan Pajzer vs Robert Kalmar with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Istvan Pajzer (2037)
- Black
- Robert Kalmar (1848)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 22. Battle of Senta Open
- Year
- 2018
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Normal Defense (E81)
About this chess game
This chess game between Istvan Pajzer (2037) and Robert Kalmar (1848) was played at 22. Battle of Senta Open in 2018 and finished 1–0. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Normal Defense (E81). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Istvan Pajzer games or Robert Kalmar games? This Istvan Pajzer vs Robert Kalmar encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Normal Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Istvan Pajzer vs Robert Kalmar?
Istvan Pajzer vs Robert Kalmar (2018) finished 1–0, a win for Istvan Pajzer.
What opening was played in Istvan Pajzer vs Robert Kalmar?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Normal Defense (ECO E81).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Istvan Pajzer vs Robert Kalmar, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.