Wolfgang Pajeken vs Istvan Almasi
Hasselbacken Open 2016, 2016 · Result 0–1 · Queen's Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Traditional Variation (E18).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Wolfgang Pajeken vs Istvan Almasi with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Wolfgang Pajeken (2269)
- Black
- Istvan Almasi (2422)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Hasselbacken Open 2016
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Queen's Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Traditional Variation (E18)
About this chess game
This chess game between Wolfgang Pajeken (2269) and Istvan Almasi (2422) was played at Hasselbacken Open 2016 in 2016 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Queen's Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Traditional Variation (E18). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Wolfgang Pajeken games or Istvan Almasi games? This Wolfgang Pajeken vs Istvan Almasi encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Traditional Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Wolfgang Pajeken vs Istvan Almasi?
Wolfgang Pajeken vs Istvan Almasi (2016) finished 0–1, a win for Istvan Almasi.
What opening was played in Wolfgang Pajeken vs Istvan Almasi?
The game opened with the Queen's Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Traditional Variation (ECO E18).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Wolfgang Pajeken vs Istvan Almasi, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.