Nazi Paikidze vs Aleksandr Lenderman
St Louis Spring Classic B, 2017 · Result 0–1 · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Classical Defense (E48).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Nazi Paikidze vs Aleksandr Lenderman with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Nazi Paikidze (2372)
- Black
- Aleksandr Lenderman (2587)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- St Louis Spring Classic B
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Classical Defense (E48)
About this chess game
This chess game between Nazi Paikidze (2372) and Aleksandr Lenderman (2587) was played at St Louis Spring Classic B in 2017 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Classical Defense (E48). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Nazi Paikidze games or Aleksandr Lenderman games? This Nazi Paikidze vs Aleksandr Lenderman encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Classical Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Nazi Paikidze vs Aleksandr Lenderman?
Nazi Paikidze vs Aleksandr Lenderman (2017) finished 0–1, a win for Aleksandr Lenderman.
What opening was played in Nazi Paikidze vs Aleksandr Lenderman?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Classical Defense (ECO E48).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Nazi Paikidze vs Aleksandr Lenderman, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.