Ortwin Paetzold vs Giorgio Perez
10. LSS Anni P-00022, 2016 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Keres Attack (B81).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Ortwin Paetzold vs Giorgio Perez with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Ortwin Paetzold (1865)
- Black
- Giorgio Perez (1404)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 10. LSS Anni P-00022
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Keres Attack (B81)
About this chess game
This chess game between Ortwin Paetzold (1865) and Giorgio Perez (1404) was played at 10. LSS Anni P-00022 in 2016 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Keres Attack (B81). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Ortwin Paetzold games or Giorgio Perez games? This Ortwin Paetzold vs Giorgio Perez encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Keres Attack.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Ortwin Paetzold vs Giorgio Perez?
Ortwin Paetzold vs Giorgio Perez (2016) finished 1–0, a win for Ortwin Paetzold.
What opening was played in Ortwin Paetzold vs Giorgio Perez?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Keres Attack (ECO B81).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Ortwin Paetzold vs Giorgio Perez, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.