Daniel-Cristian Padurean vs Laurentiu-Vlad Bobocea
2018 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation (B22).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Daniel-Cristian Padurean vs Laurentiu-Vlad Bobocea with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Daniel-Cristian Padurean (2017)
- Black
- Laurentiu-Vlad Bobocea (1753)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2018
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation (B22)
About this chess game
This chess game between Daniel-Cristian Padurean (2017) and Laurentiu-Vlad Bobocea (1753) was played in 2018 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation (B22). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Daniel-Cristian Padurean games or Laurentiu-Vlad Bobocea games? This Daniel-Cristian Padurean vs Laurentiu-Vlad Bobocea encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Daniel-Cristian Padurean vs Laurentiu-Vlad Bobocea?
Daniel-Cristian Padurean vs Laurentiu-Vlad Bobocea (2018) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Daniel-Cristian Padurean vs Laurentiu-Vlad Bobocea?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation (ECO B22).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Daniel-Cristian Padurean vs Laurentiu-Vlad Bobocea, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.