Mihai-Edward Padurariu vs Sebastian Laurenti Sarighioleanu
2017 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense (B20).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Mihai-Edward Padurariu vs Sebastian Laurenti Sarighioleanu with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Mihai-Edward Padurariu (1860)
- Black
- Sebastian Laurenti Sarighioleanu (1704)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense (B20)
About this chess game
This chess game between Mihai-Edward Padurariu (1860) and Sebastian Laurenti Sarighioleanu (1704) was played in 2017 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense (B20). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Mihai-Edward Padurariu games or Sebastian Laurenti Sarighioleanu games? This Mihai-Edward Padurariu vs Sebastian Laurenti Sarighioleanu encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Mihai-Edward Padurariu vs Sebastian Laurenti Sarighioleanu?
Mihai-Edward Padurariu vs Sebastian Laurenti Sarighioleanu (2017) finished 1–0, a win for Mihai-Edward Padurariu.
What opening was played in Mihai-Edward Padurariu vs Sebastian Laurenti Sarighioleanu?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense (ECO B20).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Mihai-Edward Padurariu vs Sebastian Laurenti Sarighioleanu, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.