Ioana Smaranda Padurariu vs Rosa Ratsma
10. Leiden Crown 2016, 2016 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation (B80).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Ioana Smaranda Padurariu vs Rosa Ratsma with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Ioana Smaranda Padurariu (2188)
- Black
- Rosa Ratsma (2027)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- 10. Leiden Crown 2016
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation (B80)
About this chess game
This chess game between Ioana Smaranda Padurariu (2188) and Rosa Ratsma (2027) was played at 10. Leiden Crown 2016 in 2016 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation (B80). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Ioana Smaranda Padurariu games or Rosa Ratsma games? This Ioana Smaranda Padurariu vs Rosa Ratsma encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Ioana Smaranda Padurariu vs Rosa Ratsma?
Ioana Smaranda Padurariu vs Rosa Ratsma (2016) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Ioana Smaranda Padurariu vs Rosa Ratsma?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation (ECO B80).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Ioana Smaranda Padurariu vs Rosa Ratsma, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.